{"id":9611,"date":"2025-10-30T23:34:01","date_gmt":"2025-10-30T18:04:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/newzquest.in\/rs-8-lakh-cash-deposited-in-bank-man-gets-tax-notice-how-he-won-case-in-itat\/"},"modified":"2025-10-30T23:34:01","modified_gmt":"2025-10-30T18:04:01","slug":"rs-8-lakh-cash-deposited-in-bank-man-gets-tax-notice-how-he-won-case-in-itat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newzquest.in\/hi\/rs-8-lakh-cash-deposited-in-bank-man-gets-tax-notice-how-he-won-case-in-itat\/","title":{"rendered":"Rs 8 lakh cash deposited in bank &#8211; man gets tax notice! How he won case in ITAT"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"nshorts-card-frame\">\n<div class=\"nshorts-cat lang-en\">\u090f\u0928 \u0936\u0949\u0930\u094d\u091f\u094d\u0938'<\/div>\n<div class=\"nshorts-headline\">Rs 8 lakh cash deposited in bank &#8211; man gets tax notice! How he won case in ITAT<\/div>\n<div class=\"nshorts-summary\">A taxpayer successfully challenged the tax department&#039;s decision to treat a large cash deposit as presumptive business income. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ruled that the Assessing Officer exceeded his jurisdiction by expanding a limited scrutiny case without proper approval, reinforcing taxpayer rights.<\/div>\n<div class=\"nshorts-link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/timesofindia.indiatimes.com\/business\/financial-literacy\/taxation\/rs-8-lakh-cash-deposited-in-bank-man-gets-tax-notice-assessing-officer-deems-it-presumptive-business-income-but-taxpayer-wins-case-in-itat-ruling-explained\/articleshow\/124961962.cms\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Read Full Story<\/a><\/div>\n<p><span class=\"nshorts-disclaimer\">Technically enhanced content presented under fair use in public-interest journalism.<\/span><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>N Shorts Rs 8 lakh cash deposited in bank &#8211; man gets tax notice! How he won case in ITAT A taxpayer successfully challenged the tax department&#039;s decision to treat a large cash deposit as presumptive business income. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ruled that the Assessing Officer exceeded his jurisdiction by expanding a limited [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"googlesitekit_rrm_CAowl-PACw:productID":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2149],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9611","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news-shorts-en"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/newzquest.in\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9611","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/newzquest.in\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/newzquest.in\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newzquest.in\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newzquest.in\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9611"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/newzquest.in\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9611\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/newzquest.in\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9611"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newzquest.in\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9611"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newzquest.in\/hi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9611"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}