INDIA bloc writes to CJI on ‘biased conduct’ of EC; DMK, AAP sign letter

Updated 7 जुलाई 2026 8:32 पूर्वाह्न

{"title":"23 Opposition Parties Urge Chief Justice to Address Alleged Election Commission Bias","excerpt":"A coalition of 23 political parties and an Independent MP has written to Chief Justice Surya Kant, raising concerns over the Election Commission’s conduct, especially its Special Intensive Revision in West Bengal and Bihar. The letter, signed by parties like DMK and AAP, highlights perceived bias and calls for a review.","body_html":"<p>In a bold move that could reshape the political landscape, 23 opposition parties and an Independent Member of Parliament have jointly addressed Chief Justice Surya Kant, urging him to intervene in what they describe as biased conduct by the Election Commission of India (ECI). The memorandum, dated June 12, highlights concerns over the Commission’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) processes in key states such as West Bengal and Bihar, and calls for a thorough review of its operations.</p>nn<h2>Background of the Letter</h2>n<p>The letter emerged after a meeting of the INDIA bloc on June 8 in Delhi, where major opposition parties convened to discuss electoral strategies. While the bloc was a platform for collective action, the memorandum was drafted by parties that chose not to attend the meeting, including the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) and the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP). The signatories expressed frustration that the ECI’s actions were undermining the democratic process.</p>nn<h2>Key Allegations</h2>n<ul>n<li>Bias in the execution of Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in West Bengal and Bihar.</li>n<li>Inconsistent application of SIR guidelines across states.</li>n<li>Potential interference in the electoral process that could favor certain parties.</li>n<li>Need for a transparent audit of the ECI’s decision‑making procedures.</li>n</ul>n<p>These points form the crux of the memorandum, which calls upon the Chief Justice to investigate and address the alleged irregularities.</p>nn<h2>Signatories and Their Positions</h2>n<p>While the full list of 23 parties is not disclosed in the article, the letter’s most prominent signatories include:</p>n<ul>n<li>DMK – The party explicitly stated it would not attend the INDIA bloc meeting, citing a post‑election betrayal by the Congress.</li>n<li>AAP – Not a member of the INDIA bloc, yet it joined the letter to underscore its concerns about the ECI’s conduct.</li>n<li>Independent MP – Added an extra layer of credibility, representing a non‑party perspective.</li>n</ul>n<p>Jairam Ramesh, a senior opposition leader, emphasized that “opposition parties are firmly anchored,” suggesting that the collective action reflects a united front against perceived electoral manipulation.</p>nn<h2>Implications for the Election Process</h2>n<p>The memorandum raises several critical questions:</p>n<ul>n<li>How does the ECI’s SIR process affect voter confidence in states with high electoral stakes?</li>n<li>What mechanisms exist to ensure impartiality in the Commission’s operations?</li>n<li>Could this letter trigger a judicial review of the ECI’s mandate?</li>n</ul>n<p>If the Chief Justice takes up the issue, it could lead to a formal inquiry or even a restructuring of the ECI’s procedures, potentially altering how elections are conducted nationwide.</p>nn<h2>Reactions from Political Leaders</h2>n<p>While the article does not detail responses from all signatories, it notes that the DMK’s decision to abstain from the INDIA bloc meeting was a deliberate statement against what it perceived as a betrayal by the Congress. AAP’s participation

लेखक के बारे में

,

सभी पोस्ट देखें

Related Stories

The 2 Best Slushie Machines of 2026: Now With Soft Serve

New York Is About to Feel Hotter Than Phoenix

The Trump Administration Is Lifting Its Export Controls on Anthropic’s Mythos and Fable AI M…

Dwayne Johnson Slammed as a ‘Coward’ for Staying Quiet on Politics; ‘Star Trek’ Icon George Takei Fires Back: ‘Silence Is Complicity’